April 30th, 12:30pm, Lucía Martínez Valdivia, “Common Meter in Situ”
Hi Poetics Fans! We’ve got some meter for you today.
Please join the PWG and Renaissance Colloquium for a work in progress discussion of Common Meter in Situ: (P/W “poetics” as always). Zoom link https://yale.zoom.us/s/99619568618. The event is open to the public.
The author adds:
“Thank you in advance, everyone, for spending some time reading and hopefully thinking with me. This will be the third chapter of my current book project, Common Meter: A Revised History of English Poetry, 1548-1948, which traces the use of common meter and its influence on post-medieval English prosody. To orient you briefly to that project: Chapter 1 is on the advent, evolution, and popularization of common meter in and through the Sternhold and Hopkins Psalms in English Meter; Chapter 2 looks at metrical revisions and corrections to printed poems in the 1550s, especially to Wyatt, showing editors and printers responding to the new metrical norm established by Sternhold and Hopkins; Chapter 4 focuses on the use of common meter in eighteenth century poetry; Chapter 5 treats its appearance in the fiction and poetry of Eliot and Hardy together with the reputation, proliferated by nineteenth century verse historians and editors, of common meter as “mere meter”; the last chapter turns to common meter in America, specifically its use in the Bay Psalm Book and in the poems of Emily Dickinson. The attached third chapter—truly a work in progress and a first draft, as becomes apparent toward the end—provides examples and analyses of common meter appearing in printed poetic collections and miscellanies; I also include some poems in two other psalm-related meters, long meter (cross-rhymed iambic tetrameter) and short meter (cross-rhymed quatrains with a 6.6.8.6 syllabic pattern), the other primary stanza forms in Sternhold and Hopkins. I have so far focused largely on George Gascoigne and George Herbert, but would like to include a fuller treatment of Isabella Whitney’s poems as well as, tentatively, a section on Katherine Philips. There is also a wealth of similar evidence from commonplace books and manuscript miscellanies, as well as from ballad broadsides, that I’ve collected but that might fall outside the bounds of the chapter. In addition to your overall thoughts, questions, insights, and hesitations, I’d be grateful to know what kinds of readings and theorization there’s an appetite for, and what you think the chapter could do without.”
Poster pdf: Lucia Martinez Valdivia