Virtual Field Trips

Ken Panko, Manager of the Instructional Technology Group, (ITG) introduced Reid Lifset, Associate Director of the Industrial Environmental Management Program and graduate student Matt Eckelman from Forestry and Environmental Studies (FES). Lifset, an associate research scholar and Matt Eckelman, a doctoral student, initiated the Elihu Paper Co. project in Second Life with the help of the Instructional Technology Group based on their desire to take their students on a virtual field trip of a pulp and paper mill in their course “Greening Business Operations.” The course has a goal of explaining the biophysical basis for industry pollution, introducing techniques for environmental assessment and increasing the familiarity of students with industrial settings. It incorporates 3-5 field trips per year to such businesses as Cytec and Sikorsky, among others. Last year Lifset stumbled across the Instructional Technology Group website and contacted Ken Panko. ITG had already purchased an island in Second Life so the group was excited when Lifset approached them last year about using Second Life for a virtual field trip. ITG’s Yianni Yessios, Manager of Web Technologies, spearheaded the actual construction of the Second Life site.

Matt Eckelman said that the course’s field trips are always the students’ favorite part of the course. The scope and challenges of industrial environmental management are more apparent when visiting industrial sites. Both Lifset and Eckleman stated that they had wanted to take the students on an actual tour of a pulp and paper mill, but they were limited both by geography and the types of industry present in contemporary New England. The pulp and paper industry had been historically important to the New England economy but there are currently no integrated pulp and paper mills in Connecticut. Given that paper production is a potentially highly-polluting industry that also relies on forest resources, a tour of a pulp and paper mill was of particular interest to FES.

Lifset and Eckelman then took us on a tour of the Elihu Pulp and Paper mill in Second Life. We walked through the recycled paper and virgin paper (from wood) processes with the avatar Yianni Baar. Information about the structure of the mill and process of producing paper has been embedded into the Second Life scale model. The floating question marks in Second Life serve as portals to a blog containing various webpages, PDFs, spreadsheets, and videos about structures and processes in real pulp and paper mills. The sound in Second Life is realistic because it was recorded in a pulp and paper mill in upstate New York. The focus of facility visits-including virtual tours- ranges from regulation and compliance to pollution prevention to broad issues of sustainability. Site visits require students to write a report and follow the main goals and arch of the class.

At this point, only students in the class have access to the mill in Second Life. Next time, the manager from a paper mill will hopefully participate as an avatar and give the tour. This is not a self-guided tour, but a guided tour led by Reid and Matt using Skype for voice. The tour was 3 hours long in Second Life, whereas a real tour would have been limited to between 40 – 60 minutes.

Yianni Yessios talked about the process of putting this virtual field trip together. The virtual environment has to be built and that takes time. Once built, it becomes an infinitely expandable instructional tool. It is a great pedagogical model, but there is overhead at the start of this type of project. Questions to ask when justifying the upfront costs: What is the lifespan? What is the population for this instructional tool? Two struggles were identified during this project. First, was defining the primary purpose of the tool; the tour was not to be self-guided but more like an actual tour. They wanted the students to get a feel for what it is like to be in a paper mill. The second struggle was the cost. When totaling the cost in money and resource, it became apparent that industry can better afford to build visualizations like this rather than higher education.

Other faculty at Yale are now interested in using Second Life. Future goals are to polish the current tour; build engineering analytics to allow users to do simulations within the mill; and build a metal smelter with funding from grant proposals.

If you’d like to see for yourself what the Pulp and Paper Mill tour was like in Second Life, please click the link below:

Pulp and Paper Mill Tour Video

Virtual Classrooms & Synchronous Learning

Matt Wilcox, Public Health Librarian and Director of Academic Technology in the School of Public Health, opened with a discussion of distance education tools and synchronous learning tools. The Yale School of Public Health has been using Adobe Connect Professional and are considering switching to Elluminate. Following last week’s session on Skype, which allows you to talk online, Adobe Connect and Elluminate allows this and also offers a shared white board, share documents and presentations, share and demonstrate applications. Users can share control with others in the session allowing for more participant interaction. Synchronous software allows for the recording the session for later use.

The School of Public Health has offered a course with Diane McMahon-Partt and Serap Aksoy to teach a vector-born disease course for students at four universities in Columbia. Via Adobe Connect, lectures are taught at Yale and projected to the students in Columbia. guest speakers John Hopkins, Notre Dame, London, and Columbia. Standard PowerPoint lectures given at Yale and projected via Adobe Connect. The sessions are recorded for use in the future and for student review. Adobe Connect has been used thus far but the school is in the process of moving to Elluminateit because it has better functionality in low-bandwidth situations. Teaching in this environment is time-consuming because of the technology involved and the different mode of interaction between students and teacher. It is difficult for teachers to monitor everything that is going on in this online environment as well as teach. It is important also to test both the technology and the materials before a class, such as the PowerPoint and embedded videos because these objects can act differently in the virtual learning environment. A small client downloaded the first time a user enters a session (java-based client).

Charlie Greenberg, Coordinator of Curriculum and Research Support, in the Medical Library introduced Elluminate with a product comparison www.elluminate.com/product_comparison.jsp. For the last two years, Charlie has used Elluminate to teach Library Science courses at San Jose State University. Charlie opened an Elluminate session from a course he taught this fall in which students gave presentations. He illustrated how students showed presentations and fielded questions from the class. There was no video involved in the course, so the students interacted with Charlie and their fellow students only through voice and instant messaging chat. Charlie felt this lack of video made students less nervous. Multipoint video is available and the Medical Library is testing it out now for applications here.

Charlie also introduced a free version of Elluminate called vRoom, which has limited functionality for small groups (3 or fewer participants). vRoom does not integrate with a phone line and does not a recording feature. However, vRoom may have applications for one-on-one interactions such as library research consultations. vRoom has a polling features to allow the presenter to ask participants questions during the interaction and the ability to upload PowerPoint and other files to share with participants in the session. Charlie also showed how to broadcast a database to show participants how to use a resource.

The Center for Language Study (CLS) has used Elluminate for Medical Spanish support. Jeremy, Coordinator of Medical Spanish at the CLS, has collaborated with Spanish tutors in Guatemala using a software called Interlangua and Elluminate for office hours. John Graves, also in the CLS, is using Elluminate for a Nahuatal distance program for 2 students in the school of forestry. Integrated video and audio for language using. Started to use Skype instead because the video was better. EDlluinate treats video as a reference rather than an intregral part of the teaching. Skype prioritizes video and is therefore better for the language technique, Total Physical Response (TPR).

Videoconferencing in the Classroom with Skype

Mary Barr, Lecturer in African American Studies, incorporated Skype videoconferencing in her classroom activities while teaching a course last term on Race, Class, and Education. Mary strives in her courses to provide hands-on and interactive experiences for her students. According to Mary, such activities engage students and ultimately provide them with a better understanding of the social problems they are studying. Skype videoconferencing is just one strategy among many she uses in her classroom to promote interactive participation. Mary chooses pedagogically relevant technologies to engage her students, the range of activities spans the incorporation of Web 2.0 applications to the creation of a Facebook page for class.

In her course on Race, Class, and Education, Mary explored the variety of ways that the education system in the US perpetuates social inequalities. She used the movie “Hoop Dreams” to demonstrate the societal tendency to vocationally track students. Through a friend, Mary was able to contact the film’s executive producer, Gordon Quinn, and ask him if he’d be willing to be part of a videoconference with the class. Once Gordon Quinn agreed to participate in the videoconference, Mary turned to Matt Regan, an Instructional Technologist with the Instructional Technology Group, for technical assistance with videoconferencing. Matt suggested using Skype for videoconferencing.

Prior to the videoconference, students posted questions and comments about “Hoop Dreams” for Gordon Quinn on their Facebook course page. Gordon answered both questions posted to the Facebook page and questions asked live during the interview. During the videoconference, Matt simultaneously filmed the students and recorded the conference with Gordon. While filming the session, Matt zoomed in on the students individually as they asked questions. He used “Call Recorder” to record Gordon’s side of the session through Skype. Gordon was located in his film company office in Chicago. The setup was very informal – phones went off, people walked by, etc. The recorded session allowed one to see Gordon in his element. After the video conference, Matt used iMovie to stitch footage of the students and footage of Gordon Quinn together in a DVD so you can see both sides of the conversation through a split screen technique.

Mary pointed out some of the advantages and disadvantages of using Skype for videoconferencing. On the positive side, Skype is convenient, costs associated with using the service are low, and it allows you to bring visiting lecturers into your class easily. Through videoconferencing, students participate more in their own learning, hence they are more invested. Mary would definitely recommend videoconferening, though it is not a perfect medium. As far as detractors go, Mary found that students were uncharacteristically quiet due to the presence of the camera in the room. It was obvious that they felt freer to talk when not being filmed. Also, given that both sides were more interested in watching the screens in front of them rather than looking into the camera while they talked, there was a perception that the interlocutor was avoiding eye-contact. In this way she found it worse than teleconferencing.

Mary said that Matt went above and beyond the call of duty by creating the DVD of the videoconference. The DVD sports footage of the students, Gordon Quinn, and the film itself. Matt spliced in scenes from the film that Gordon had referenced during the videoconference. Mary will thus be able to use the DVD in any future offerings of this course. This allows one to explore the possibilities at one’s disposal for integrating the recorded videoconference into the course materials.

Matt had a lot of fun doing this project and experimenting with classroom uses of Skype. He had previously  used Skype for communicating with his wife and daughters while they were abroad. Skype uses VOIP – voice over internet protocol – to to convert voice signals into data streams. While Skype’s VOIP allows for video conferencing, Matt cautioned people not to use it for high profile videoconferences, since quality is mediocre.

Using Skype is simple – all you have to do is download the software, create an account and screen name, and start Skyping other users. You can use just the audio portion of Skype, or you can use the video feature. The beauty of Skype is that it can call other computers, as well as landlines and cell phones. The service is also quite inexpensive when compared to other phone plans. Skype is a flexible platform that allows for the addition of various add-ons that are downloadable. Each session is easy to set up, just double click on the person you want to contact and you are ready to go. The video communication feature is excellent, though it requires a fast internet connection. Overall Skype is more stable with a cable modem, less so with dial-up or wireless. If you use Outlook, Skype can integrate your Outlook contacts. Skype can also be integrated within your browser. It also has an IM client. You can use third party software, “Call recorder” or “Pamela,” to record your conversation in mp3 format. Skype also allows you to send files.

Some things to be aware of before using Skype, you may require additional hardware components depending on your computer. These include webcams, microphones, etc. It all depends on what your machine is equipped with. Also, transmissions can be lost – due to battery life or connections that fail. Security vulnerabilities were a problem with previous versions of Skype, though this has since been resolved to a great extent.

Matt had some helpful hints for using Skype: allow enough set-up time, have a good microphone, ensure that Skype is using the correct microphone – be it internal or external, test the connection ahead of time, and synchronize the time with your interlocutor, also be aware of potential distractions: cell phones, walk-bys, picture-in-picture display.

Matt suggested that you can use Skype in your classroom to conduct interviews or tutoring, to connect with students in different countries or peer faculty, to collaborate on group projects, and to attend remote lectures.

To access Matt’s presentation, please click on Videoconferencing with Skype

Please contact itg@yale.edu or clc@yale.edu with any questions!

For more information on similar projects, please see our most recent EdTech Newsletter.

Metagallery – Finding & Organizing Images

Karen Kupiec, Director, Library Access Integration Services, introduced Metagallery. This new tool was developed jointly by the Visual Resources Collection and CMI2. The Visual Resources Collection has now digitized over 260,000 images from the slide and photograph collection and they had been exploring ways to make this digital content more easily accessible for Yale courses. CMI2 was simultaneously working with professors who were presenting images in the classroom. The two departments pooled resources to develop Metagallery to combine content and tools to use that content in support of teaching and research. Metagallery also allows for the integration of institutional, licensed (ARTstor), and personal images and other multimedia objects for teaching and learning. The tool has been available since November 2008 and is still in beta. Both the VRC and CMI2 are looking for feedback.

Approximately 5 professors are using Metagallery to support their courses. In one example, Professor Koichi Shinohara is teaching a course on Sacred places in Asia and utilizing Metagallery to organize the 500 images that compliment the readings for the course. Metagallery has been integrated into the Classesv2 for this course and students are sharing Metagallery image groups via links on a course blog.

Carolyn Caizzi, Technology Specialist in the Visual Resources Collection, offered a tour of the Metagallery walking through the ways to browse and search the images. Carolyn also pointed out that the images in the Visual Resources Collection are not just art and art history, but include visual and material culture across the disciplines. She also noted that of the images in Metagallery are downloadable and available for use in Powerpoint.

Gabe Rossi, Instructional Technologist at CMI2, walked us through the rationale for the Metagallery development. He highlighted that one of the drivers for development was the need to make collections more visible and fully integrated into course activities. He also mentioned that Metagallery allows users to augment the metadata and therefore contextualize it for use in classes.  Additionally, other formats and media can be added to groups such as video, audio, etc.

This tool can also be used to organize and group your own personal media collections. The file size limit is 50 megabytes per object but currently there is no limit to storage space for individuals. This will evolve as the tool develops.

Currently the developers of Metagallery are working with focus groups and doing usability testing. The ultimate goal is to add other Yale Collections to Metagallery for enhanced searchability. There is a “Send us your feedback” button on the bottom of each page.

If interested in using Metagallery for courses, contact Carolyn Caizzi, carolyn.caizzi@yale.edu. For new features or development contact Gabe Rossi, gabriel.rossi@yale.edu.

For information about using Metagallery, please see the attachment:

VRC Metagallery

YouTube and Beyond

The Teaching w/ Technology session next week is a hands-on video session. Please join us at 11:00am next Tuesday in room L01 of the Bass Library to work with some of the programs mentioned above. We will have staff there to support you.

Carolyn Caizzi, Visual Resource Collection in the Yale Library, will be running a 3-part video workshop on shooting, editing, and sharing video. There are spots available for the April series. Contact barbara.rockenbach@yale.edu if you are interested in signing up. We can also arrange future workshops.

CLC Media Check-Out Service:
The Collaborative Learning Center now has video cameras, tripods, and digital cameras for check-out. To check out the equipment, go to the Technology Troubleshooting Office on the lower level of the Bass Library. Contact clc@yale.edu with any questions about the equipment. There will be an online reservation system shortly.

Ken Panko, Manager of the Instructional Technology Group, started the session by asking the group what intellectual question drove attendees to this session. One attendee was interested in integrating video into his class and the software and hardware used for video. FreePath, a presentation software, that allows you to arrange various types of media while teaching (video, images, audio, etc.) Another attendee was interested in embedding YouTube into Classesv2. To do this in Classesv2, go to the Content area in Classesv2, click on the Flash button, and paste in the URL of the YouTube video and specify the size you want to display. You can also upload videos to the resources section in Classesv2.

Kaltura is a tool for creating, editing and sharing video easily for courses. Kaltura videos can also be easily uploaded to YouTube. Another use for Kaltura is for student responses to lectures. This functions almost as a video discussion board. It is also possible to use Kaltura for simple lecture capture if your laptop has camera for recording voice and image.

Michael Farina, Senior Lecturer in Italian, began by asking why most people only go to YouTube when searching for video. He named Veeple, Videosurf, Viddler, Vimeo, Invision.tv, WorldTV as options beyond YouTube. There is a concern that YouTube will run into legal issues in the future because of copyright. Video search in Google is limited because the search relies on words, and therefore tags, for videos. Three good search options for video search beyond YouTube: Pixsy, Invision.tv, and Videosurf. Pixsy and Invision.tv use tags, but VideoSurf utilizes algorithms to search on faces and other visual elements.

Using Video for Teaching: Professor Farina used to use Veeple but because of changes this fall to the program, he now uses Vimeo, blip.tv and Viddler. Blip.tv integrates with Facebook for seemless posting of lectures. Vimeo allows for grouping video and commenting by students. Viddler allows users to leave comments, textual or video comments, within the video itself. Blip.tv is like having your own television station. You can create and download videos and arrange in a series like a TV show.

Splicd allows you to extract video excerpts from YouTube videos. Adamsapp, is an indication of where we are going. It allows you to create video from static documents. It provides one with the ability to create an interactive syllabus, i.e. link out to a video or a digital book or article.

For more detailed information, please click on Professor Michael Farina’s slides below: